Skip to content

Product

Adobe phonegap vulnerabilities

5 published CVES affecting Adobe phonegap, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
5
Critical
0
High
5
Medium
0
Low
0
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0

Latest Adobe phonegap CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 8.2%

    Apache Cordova 3.3.0 and earlier and Adobe PhoneGap 2.9.0 and earlier on Windows Phone 7 and 8 do not properly restrict navigation events, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended device-resource restrictions via content that is accessed (1) in an IFRAME element or (2) wi...

  2. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 4.2%

    Adobe PhoneGap before 2.6.0 on Android uses the shouldOverrideUrlLoading callback instead of the proper shouldInterceptRequest callback, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended device-resource restrictions via content that is accessed (1) in an IFRAME element or (2) with...

  3. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 11.9%

    Apache Cordova 3.3.0 and earlier and Adobe PhoneGap 2.9.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to bypass intended device-resource restrictions of an event-based bridge via a crafted library clone that leverages IFRAME script execution and directly accesses bridge JavaScript objects...

  4. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 11.4%

    Apache Cordova 3.3.0 and earlier and Adobe PhoneGap 2.9.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to bypass intended device-resource restrictions of an event-based bridge via a crafted library clone that leverages IFRAME script execution and waits a certain amount of time for an OnJsP...

  5. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 8.9%

    Apache Cordova 3.3.0 and earlier and Adobe PhoneGap 2.9.0 and earlier do not anchor the end of domain-name regular expressions, which allows remote attackers to bypass a whitelist protection mechanism via a domain name that contains an acceptable name as an initial substring.

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.