Skip to content

Product

apache wss4j vulnerabilities

12 published CVES affecting apache wss4j, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
12
Critical
3
High
5
Medium
4
Low
0
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0

Latest apache wss4j CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 0.58%

    An authentication bypass in the DOM security processor in Apache WSS4J allows unauthenticated remote attackers to forge authenticated SOAP messages via a crafted unsigned SAML sender-vouches assertion containing an attacker-controlled key. Users are recommended to upgrade to vers...

  2. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 0.55%

    Apache WSS4J accepted attacker-controlled derived-key lengths and offsets without adequate bounds. This could permit cryptographically weak keys or excessive CPU and memory consumption when processing crafted WS-Security messages. The fixes enforce a minimum key length of 16 byte...

  3. HighCVSS 8.8 EPSS 22.7%

    An attacker that is able to modify Velocity templates may execute arbitrary Java code or run arbitrary system commands with the same privileges as the account running the Servlet container. This applies to applications that allow untrusted users to upload/modify velocity template...

  4. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 5.5%

    Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.0.x before 2.0.2 improperly leaks information about decryption failures when decrypting an encrypted key or message data, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover the plaintext form of a symmetric key via a series of crafted messages....

  5. MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 7.5%

    Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.x before 2.0.2 allows remote attackers to bypass the requireSignedEncryptedDataElements configuration via a vectors related to "wrapping attacks."

  6. MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 9.2%

    Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.x before 2.0.2, as used in Apache CXF 2.7.x before 2.7.13 and 3.0.x before 3.0.2, when using TransportBinding, does not properly enforce the SAML SubjectConfirmation method security semantics, which allows remote attackers to conduct spoofing atta...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.