A heap-based buffer overflow exists in XML Decompression DecodeTreeBlock in AT&T Labs Xmill 0.7. A crafted input file can lead to remote code execution. This is not the same as any of: CVE-2021-21810, CVE-2021-21811, CVE-2021-21812, CVE-2021-21815, CVE-2021-21825, CVE-2021-21826,...
Product
att xmill vulnerabilities
13 published CVES affecting att xmill, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 13
- Critical
- 9
- High
- 4
- Medium
- 0
- Low
- 0
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 0
Latest att xmill CVEs
Newest publication first
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 2.4%
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 1.1%
A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the XML-parsing CreateLabelOrAttrib functionality of AT&T Labs’ Xmill 0.7. A specially crafted XML file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 1.1%
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the XML Decompression DecodeTreeBlock functionality of AT&T Labs Xmill 0.7. In the default case of DecodeTreeBlock a label is created via CurPath::AddLabel in order to track the label for later reference. An attacker can provid...
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 1.1%
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the XML Decompression DecodeTreeBlock functionality of AT&T Labs Xmill 0.7. Within DecodeTreeBlock which is called during the decompression of an XMI file, a UINT32 is loaded from the file and used as trusted input as the lengt...
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 1.1%
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the XML Decompression DecodeTreeBlock functionality of AT&T Labs Xmill 0.7. Within DecodeTreeBlock which is called during the decompression of an XMI file, a UINT32 is loaded from the file and used as trusted input as the lengt...
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 2.3%
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the XML Decompression PlainTextUncompressor::UncompressItem functionality of AT&T Labs’ Xmill 0.7. A specially crafted XMI file can lead to remote code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnera...
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 1.1%
A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the XML-parsing ParseAttribs functionality of AT&T Labs’ Xmill 0.7. A specially crafted XML file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
-
HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 0.33%
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the command-line-parsing HandleFileArg functionality of AT&T Labs' Xmill 0.7. Within the function HandleFileArg the argument filepattern is under control of the user who passes it in from the command line. filepattern is passe...
-
HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 0.33%
Within the function HandleFileArg the argument filepattern is under control of the user who passes it in from the command line. filepattern is passed directly to memcpy copying the path provided by the user into a staticly sized buffer without any length checks resulting in a sta...
-
HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 0.34%
Within the function HandleFileArg the argument filepattern is under control of the user who passes it in from the command line. filepattern is passed directly to strlen to determine the ending location of the char* passed in by the user, no checks are done to see if the passed in...
-
HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 0.33%
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the command-line-parsing HandleFileArg functionality of AT&T Labs’ Xmill 0.7. Within the function HandleFileArg the argument filepattern is under control of the user who passes it in from the command line. filepattern is passe...
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 2.5%
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the XML Decompression EnumerationUncompressor::UncompressItem functionality of AT&T Labs’ Xmill 0.7. A specially crafted XMI file can lead to remote code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulne...
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 2.3%
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the XML Decompression LabelDict::Load functionality of AT&T Labs’ Xmill 0.7. A specially crafted XMI file can lead to remote code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.