Vendor
32 published CVES affecting bluecoat, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
Newest publication first · page 1 of 2
Blue Coat Advanced Secure Gateway 6.6, CacheFlow 3.4, ProxySG 6.5 and 6.6 allows remote attackers to bypass blocked requests, user authentication, and payload scanning.
Symantec SSL Visibility (SSLV) 3.8.4FC, 3.9, 3.10 before 3.10.4.1, and 3.11 before 3.11.3.1 is susceptible to a denial-of-service vulnerability that impacts the SSL servers for intercepted SSL connections. A malicious SSL client can, under certain circumstances, temporarily exhau...
Blue Coat Advanced Secure Gateway (ASG) 6.6 before 6.6.5.4 and Content Analysis System (CAS) 1.3 before 1.3.7.4 are susceptible to an OS command injection vulnerability. An authenticated malicious administrator can execute arbitrary OS commands with elevated system privileges.
Open redirect vulnerability in Blue Coat ProxySG 6.5 before 6.5.8.8 and 6.6 and Advanced Secure Gateway (ASG) 6.6 might allow remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a base64-encoded URL in conjunction with a "clear text" one in...
Blue Coat Unified Agent before 4.6.2 does not prevent modification of its configuration files when running in local enforcement mode, which allows local administrators to unblock categories or disable the agent via unspecified vectors.
Blue Coat ProxyClient before 3.3.3.3 and 3.4.x before 3.4.4.10 and Unified Agent before 4.1.3.151952 does not properly validate certain certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof ProxySG Client Managers, and consequently modify configurations and execute arbi...
The commandline interface in Blue Coat Content Analysis System (CAS) 1.1 before 1.1.4.2 allows remote administrators to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors, related to "command injection."
The caching feature in SGOS in Blue Coat ProxySG 5.5 through 5.5.11.3, 6.1 through 6.1.6.3, 6.2 through 6.2.15.3, 6.4 through 6.4.6.1, and 6.3 and 6.5 before 6.5.4 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions during a time window after account deletion...
Blue Coat ProxySG before 6.2.14.1, 6.3.x, 6.4.x, and 6.5 before 6.5.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and dropped connections) via a recursive href in an HTML page, which triggers a large number of HTTP RW pipeline pre-fetch requests.
Blue Coat ProxySG 6.1 before SGOS 6.1.5.1 and 6.2 before SGOS 6.2.2.1 writes the secure heap to core images, which allows context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive authentication information by leveraging read access to a downloaded core file.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Blue Coat Director before 5.5.2.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving the HTTP TRACE method.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Java Management Console in Blue Coat ProxySG before SGOS 4.3.4.1, 5.x before SGOS 5.4.5.1, 5.5 before SGOS 5.5.4.1, and 6.x before SGOS 6.1.1.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Blue Coat ProxyAV appliance before 3.2.6.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change a password, (2) modify a policy, or (3) restart the device.
The Active Content Transformation functionality in Blue Coat ProxySG before SGOS 4.3.4.2, 5.x before SGOS 5.4.5.1, 5.5 before SGOS 5.5.4.1, and 6.x before SGOS 6.1.2.1 allows remote attackers to bypass JavaScript detection via HTML entities.
Blue Coat ProxySG before SGOS 4.3.4.1, 5.x before SGOS 5.4.5.1, 5.5 before SGOS 5.5.4.1, and 6.x before SGOS 6.1.1.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary CLI commands by leveraging read-only administrator privileges and establishing an HTTPS session.
Stack-based buffer overflow in the BCAAA component before build 60258, as used by Blue Coat ProxySG 4.2.3 through 6.1 and ProxyOne, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large packet to the synchronization port (16102/tcp).
Directory traversal vulnerability in Blue Coat Reporter 9.x before 9.2.4.13, 9.2.5.x before 9.2.5.1, and 9.3 before 9.3.1.2 on Windows allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, and consequently execute arbitrary code, via an unspecified HTTP request.
Blue Coat ProxySG, when transparent interception mode is enabled, uses the HTTP Host header to determine the remote endpoint, which allows remote attackers to bypass access controls for Flash, Java, Silverlight, and probably other technologies, and possibly communicate with restr...
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the ICAP patience page in Blue Coat Security Gateway OS (SGOS) 4.2 before 4.2.9, 5.2 before 5.2.5, and 5.3 before 5.3.1.7 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the URL.
Buffer overflow in k9filter.exe in BlueCoat K9 Web Protection 3.2.36, and probably other versions before 3.2.44, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP GET request to port 2372.
Blue Coat Systems WinProxy 6.1a and 6.0 r1c, and possibly earlier, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP CONNECT request, which triggers heap corruption.
Blue Coat Proxy Security Gateway OS (SGOS) 4.1.2.1 does not enforce CONNECT rules when using Deep Content Inspection, which allows remote attackers to bypass connection filters.
Buffer overflow in BlueCoat (a) WinProxy before 6.1a and (b) the web console access functionality in ProxyAV before 2.4.2.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long Host: header.
Blue Coat Systems Inc. WinProxy before 6.1a allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a large number of packets with 0xFF characters to the Telnet port (TCP 23), which corrupts the heap.
The listening daemon in Blue Coat Systems Inc. WinProxy before 6.1a allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long HTTP request that causes an out-of-bounds read.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.