Skip to content

Product

clearswift mailsweeper vulnerabilities

16 published CVES affecting clearswift mailsweeper, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
16
Critical
0
High
13
Medium
3
Low
0
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0

Latest clearswift mailsweeper CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 2.4%

    Multiple content security gateway and antivirus products allow remote attackers to bypass content restrictions via MIME messages that use non-standard separator characters, or use standard separators incorrectly, within MIME headers, fields, parameters, or values, which may be in...

  2. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 2.4%

    Multiple content security gateway and antivirus products allow remote attackers to bypass content restrictions via MIME messages that use non-standard but frequently supported Content-Transfer-Encoding values such as (1) uuencode, (2) mac-binhex40, and (3) yenc, which may be inte...

  3. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 2.4%

    Multiple content security gateway and antivirus products allow remote attackers to bypass content restrictions via MIME messages that use malformed quoting in MIME headers, parameters, and values, including (1) fields that should not be quoted, (2) duplicate quotes, or (3) missin...

  4. MediumCVSS 6.4 EPSS 4.1%

    Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in LHA 1.14 allow remote attackers or local users to create arbitrary files via an LHA archive containing filenames with (1) .. sequences or (2) absolute pathnames with double leading slashes ("//absolute/path").

  5. HighCVSS 10.0 EPSS 10.3%

    Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the get_header function in header.c for LHA 1.14, as used in products such as Barracuda Spam Firewall, allow remote attackers or local users to execute arbitrary code via long directory or file names in an LHA archive, which triggers the o...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.