In Paramiko through 4.0.0 before a448945, rsakey.py allows the SHA-1 algorithm.
Product
debian/paramiko vulnerabilities
11 published CVES affecting debian/paramiko, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 11
- Critical
- 1
- High
- 1
- Medium
- 3
- Low
- 1
- Unscored
- 5
- CISA KEV
- 0
Latest debian/paramiko CVEs
Newest publication first
-
LowCVSS 3.4 EPSS 0.11%
-
DLA-4409-1 paramiko - security update
PublishedUnknown -
CVE-2023-48795 Prefix Truncation Attack against ChaCha20-Poly1305 and Encrypt-then-MAC aka Terrapin
PublishedMediumCVSS 5.9 EPSS 93.5% Public exploitThe SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end...
-
DLA-3104-1 paramiko - security update
PublishedUnknown -
DLA-2959-1 paramiko - security update
PublishedUnknown -
MediumCVSS 5.9 EPSS 2.1%
In Paramiko before 2.10.1, a race condition (between creation and chmod) in the write_private_key_file function could allow unauthorized information disclosure.
-
DLA-2860-1 paramiko - security update
PublishedUnknown -
DLA-1556-1 paramiko - security update
PublishedUnknown -
HighCVSS 8.8 EPSS 4.4%
Paramiko version 2.4.1, 2.3.2, 2.2.3, 2.1.5, 2.0.8, 1.18.5, 1.17.6 contains a Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in SSH server that can result in RCE. This attack appear to be exploitable via network connectivity.
-
CVE-2018-7750 Paramiko not properly checking authentication before processing other requests
PublishedCriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 27.1% Public exploittransport.py in the SSH server implementation of Paramiko before 1.17.6, 1.18.x before 1.18.5, 2.0.x before 2.0.8, 2.1.x before 2.1.5, 2.2.x before 2.2.3, 2.3.x before 2.3.2, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 does not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing othe...
-
MediumCVSS 4.3 EPSS 1.6%
common.py in Paramiko 1.7.1 and earlier, when using threads or forked processes, does not properly use RandomPool, which allows one session to obtain sensitive information from another session by predicting the state of the pool.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.