Skip to content

Product

debian/xterm vulnerabilities

14 published CVES affecting debian/xterm, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
14
Critical
3
High
3
Medium
1
Low
2
Unscored
5
CISA KEV
0

Latest debian/xterm CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 0.86%

    xterm before 380 supports ReGIS reporting for character-set names even if they have unexpected characters (i.e., neither alphanumeric nor underscore), aka a pointer/overflow issue. This can only occur for xterm installations that are configured at compile time to use a certain ex...

  2. CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 6.6%

    xterm before 375 allows code execution via font ops, e.g., because an OSC 50 response may have Ctrl-g and therefore lead to command execution within the vi line-editing mode of Zsh. NOTE: font ops are not allowed in the xterm default configurations of some Linux distributions.

  3. HighCVSS 9.3 EPSS 4.9%

    CRLF injection vulnerability in xterm allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary commands via LF (aka \n) characters surrounding a command name within a Device Control Request Status String (DECRQSS) escape sequence in a text file, a related issue to CVE-2003-0063 and CV...

  4. LowCVSS 1.9 EPSS 0.46%

    xterm on Slackware Linux 10.2 stores information that had been displayed for a different user account using the same xterm process, which might allow local users to bypass file permissions and read other users' files, or obtain other sensitive information, by reading the xterm pr...

  5. HighCVSS 7.2 EPSS 0.45%

    X.Org and XFree86, including libX11, xdm, xf86dga, xinit, xload, xtrans, and xterm, does not check the return values for setuid and seteuid calls when attempting to drop privileges, which might allow local users to gain privileges by causing those calls to fail, such as by exceed...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.