Vendor
220 published CVES affecting Devolutions, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
Newest publication first · page 9 of 9
Dashlane password and Keepass Server password in My Account Settings are not encrypted in the database in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2022.2.26 and prior versions and Devolutions Server 2022.3.1 and prior versions which allows database users to read the data. This issue af...
Database connections on deleted users could stay active on MySQL data sources in Remote Desktop Manager 2022.3.7 and below which allow deleted users to access unauthorized data. This issue affects : Remote Desktop Manager 2022.3.7 and prior versions.
Improper Access Control vulnerability in the Duo SMS two-factor of Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2022.2.14 and earlier allows attackers to bypass the application lock. This issue affects: Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager version 2022.2.14 and prior versions.
Incorrect permission management in Devolutions Server before 2022.2 allows a new user with a preexisting username to inherit the permissions of that previous user.
HTML injection vulnerability in secure messages of Devolutions Server before 2022.2 allows attackers to alter the rendering of the page or redirect a user to another site.
Information Exposure vulnerability in My Account Settings of Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager before 2022.1.8 allows authenticated users to access credentials of other users. This issue affects: Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager versions prior to 2022.1.8.
A path traversal issue in entry attachments in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager before 2022.2 allows attackers to create or overwrite files in an arbitrary location.
A lack of password masking in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager allows physically proximate attackers to observe sensitive data. A caching issue can cause sensitive fields to sometimes stay revealed when closing and reopening a panel, which could lead to involuntarily disclosing...
The biometric lock in Devolutions Password Hub for iOS before 2021.3.4 allows attackers to access the application because of authentication bypass. An attacker must rapidly make failed biometric authentication attempts.
An incomplete permission check on entries in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager before 2021.2.16 allows attackers to bypass permissions via batch custom PowerShell.
Devolutions Server before 2021.1.18, and LTS before 2020.3.20, allows attackers to intercept private keys via a man-in-the-middle attack against the connections/partial endpoint (which accepts cleartext).
An SQL Injection issue in Devolutions Server before 2021.1 and Devolutions Server LTS before 2020.3.18 allows an administrative user to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a username in api/security/userinfo/delete.
An overly permissive CORS policy in Devolutions Server before 2021.1 and Devolutions Server LTS before 2020.3.18 allows a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page.
An issue was discovered in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager before 2020.2.12. There is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in webviews.
An issue was discovered in Devolutions Server before 2020.3. There is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in entries of type Document.
An issue was discovered in Devolutions Server before 2020.3. There is an exposure of sensitive information in diagnostic files.
An issue was discovered in Devolutions Server before 2020.3. There is broken access control on Password List entry elements.
An issue was discovered in Devolutions Server before 2020.3. There is Broken Authentication with Windows domain users.
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Administrative Reports in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager before 2021.1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via multiple input fields.
An issue was discovered in the gfwx crate before 0.3.0 for Rust. Because ImageChunkMut does not have bounds on its Send trait or Sync trait, a data race and memory corruption can occur.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.