EChat Server 3.1 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the chat.ghp endpoint that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by supplying an oversized username parameter. Attackers can send a GET request to chat.ghp with a malicious username value containing shellcod...
Product
echatserver easy chat server vulnerabilities
7 published CVES affecting echatserver easy chat server, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 7
- Critical
- 2
- High
- 5
- Medium
- 0
- Low
- 0
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 0
Latest echatserver easy chat server CVEs
Newest publication first
-
CriticalCVSS 9.3 EPSS 0.84%
-
HighCVSS 8.7 EPSS 0.54%
Easy Chat Server 3.1 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows remote attackers to crash the application by sending oversized data in the message parameter. Attackers can establish a session via the chat.ghp endpoint and then send a POST request to body2.ghp with an...
-
HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 0.40%
Efs Software Easy Chat Server Version 3.1 was discovered to contain a DLL hijacking vulnerability via the component TextShaping.dll. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted DLL.
-
HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 1.1%
An issue was discovered in EFS Easy Chat Server 3.1. There is a buffer overflow via a long body2.ghp message parameter.
-
HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 1.7%
register.ghp in EFS Software Easy Chat Server versions 2.0 to 3.1 allows remote attackers to discover passwords by sending the username parameter in conjunction with an empty password parameter, and reading the HTML source code of the response.
-
HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 1.3%
register.ghp in EFS Software Easy Chat Server versions 2.0 to 3.1 allows remote attackers to reset arbitrary passwords via a crafted POST request to registresult.htm.
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 24.1% Framework module
There is a remote stack-based buffer overflow (SEH) in register.ghp in EFS Software Easy Chat Server versions 2.0 to 3.1. By sending an overly long username string to registresult.htm for registering the user, an attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.