Skip to content

Product

eclipse omr vulnerabilities

7 published CVES affecting eclipse omr, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
7
Critical
0
High
3
Medium
4
Low
0
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0

Latest eclipse omr CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. MediumCVSS 6.9 EPSS 0.49%

    In the Eclipse OMR port library component since release 0.2.0, an API function to return the textual names of all supported processor features was not accounting for the separator inserted between processor features. If the output buffer supplied to this function was incorrectly...

  2. MediumCVSS 6.9 EPSS 0.30%

    In the Eclipse OMR compiler component, since release 0.7.0, an optimization enabled for Eclipse OpenJ9 consumers of OMR on Z processors incorrectly handles NUL (0x00) characters during the Latin-compatible charset (UTF-8, ISO8859-1, ASCII, etc) to IBM-1047/037 translation sequenc...

  3. HighCVSS 7.1 EPSS 0.18%

    In Eclipse OMR versions 0.2.0 to 0.4.0, some of the z/OS atoe print functions use a constant length buffer for string conversion. If the input format string and arguments are larger than the buffer size then buffer overflow occurs. Beginning in version 0.5.0, the conversion buffe...

  4. MediumCVSS 5.1 EPSS 0.18%

    In Eclipse OMR, from the initial contribution to version 0.4.0, some OMR internal port library and utilities consumers of z/OS atoe functions do not check their return values for NULL memory pointers or for memory allocation failures. This can lead to NULL pointer dereference cra...

  5. HighCVSS 7.4 EPSS 0.67%

    Prior to 0.1, all builds of Eclipse OMR contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.