The Read More & Accordion plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based blind SQL Injection via the 'orderby' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.7. This is due to the use of esc_sql() without surrounding the value in quotes in an ORDER BY clause inside the get...
Vendor
edmonparker vulnerabilities
5 published CVES affecting edmonparker, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 5
- Critical
- 0
- High
- 2
- Medium
- 3
- Low
- 0
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 0
Products
Latest edmonparker CVEs
Newest publication first
-
MediumCVSS 4.9 EPSS 0.45%
-
HighCVSS 8.8 EPSS 1.3%
The Read More & Accordion plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.7. This is due to the 'RadMoreAjax::importData' function not restricting which database tables can be written to during import and not properly validatin...
-
CVE-2025-0810 Read More & Accordion <= 3.4.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Local File Inclusion
PublishedHighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 0.23%The Read More & Accordion plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the addNewButtons() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to in...
-
MediumCVSS 4.3 EPSS 0.34%
The Read More & Accordion plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification and loss of data due to a missing capability check on the expmDeleteData() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subs...
-
MediumCVSS 6.1 EPSS 0.37%
The Contact Form Master WordPress plugin through 1.0.7 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.