Skip to content

Vendor

elog project vulnerabilities

9 published CVES affecting elog project, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
9
Critical
1
High
7
Medium
1
Low
0
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0
Atom feed of elog project alerts

Products

Latest elog project CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. HighCVSS 8.7 EPSS 0.38%

    ELOG allows an authenticated user to modify another user's profile. An attacker can edit a target user's email address, then request a password reset, and take control of the target account. By default, ELOG is not configured to allow self-registration.

  2. CriticalCVSS 9.3 EPSS 0.32%

    ELOG allows an authenticated user to modify or overwrite the configuration file, resulting in denial of service. If the execute facility is specifically enabled with the "-x" command line flag, attackers could execute OS commands on the host machine. By default, ELOG is not confi...

  3. HighCVSS 8.6 EPSS 0.32%

    ELOG allows an authenticated user to upload arbitrary HTML files. The HTML content is executed in the context of other users when they open the file. Because ELOG includes usernames and password hashes in certain HTTP requests, an attacker can obtain the target's credentials and...

  4. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 3.3%

    ELOG 3.1.4-57bea22 and below is affected by a denial of service vulnerability due to a use after free. A remote unauthenticated attacker can crash the ELOG server by sending multiple HTTP POST requests which causes the ELOG function retrieve_url() to use a freed variable.

  5. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 1.3%

    ELOG 3.1.4-57bea22 and below is affected by an information disclosure vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker can access the server's configuration file by sending an HTTP GET request. Amongst the configuration data, the attacker may gain access to valid admin usernames...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.