Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in ESTsoft ALZip on Windows allows SmartScreen bypass.This issue affects ALZip: from 12.01 before 12.29.
Product
estsoft alzip vulnerabilities
7 published CVES affecting estsoft alzip, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 7
- Critical
- 0
- High
- 5
- Medium
- 2
- Low
- 0
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 0
Latest estsoft alzip CVEs
Newest publication first
-
MediumCVSS 6.2 EPSS 0.16%
-
HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 1.6%
Alzip 10.83 and earlier version contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability, caused by improper bounds checking during the parsing of crafted ISO archive file format. By persuading a victim to open a specially-crafted ISO archive file, an attacker could execution arbitra...
-
HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 1.4%
Alzip 10.76.0.0 and earlier is vulnerable to a stack overflow caused by improper bounds checking. By persuading a victim to open a specially-crafted LZH archive file, a attacker could execute arbitrary code execution.
-
HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 0.42%
ESTsoft ALZip before 10.76 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via creating a malicious .DLL file and installing it in a specific directory: %PROGRAMFILES%\ESTsoft\ALZip\Formats, %PROGRAMFILES%\ESTsoft\ALZip\Coders, %PROGRAMFILES(X86)%\ESTsoft\ALZip\Formats, or %PROGRAMF...
-
HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 3.0%
Stack-based buffer overflow in ESTsoft ALZip 8.51 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted MS-DOS device file, as demonstrated by use of "AUX" as the initial substring of a filename.
-
HighCVSS 9.3 EPSS 5.5%
Buffer overflow in ALZip 8.21 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted mim file.
-
MediumCVSS 5.1 EPSS 3.1%
Multiple buffer overflows in ALZip 6.12 (Korean), 6.1 (International), and 5.52 (English) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in a compressed (1) ALZ, (2) ARJ, (3) ZIP, (4) UUE, or (5) XXE archive.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.