Skip to content

Vendor

ETIC Telecom vulnerabilities

9 published CVES affecting ETIC Telecom, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
9
Critical
2
High
2
Medium
5
Low
0
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0
Atom feed of ETIC Telecom alerts

Products

Latest ETIC Telecom CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. MediumCVSS 6.3 EPSS 0.18%

    All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.9.19 are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). An external attacker with no access to the device can force the end user into submitting a "setconf" method request, not requiring any CSRF token, which ca...

  2. MediumCVSS 4.8 EPSS 0.23%

    All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0 are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting in the appliance site name. The ETIC RAS web server saves the site name and then presents it to the administrators in a few different pages.

  3. MediumCVSS 5.3 EPSS 0.24%

    All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0 are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting (XSS) attacks in get view method under view parameter. The ETIC RAS web server uses dynamic pages that get their input from the client side and reflect the inpu...

  4. MediumCVSS 4.8 EPSS 0.23%

    All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0 are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting (XSS) attacks in the method parameter. The ETIC RAS web server uses dynamic pages that gets their input from the client side and reflects the input in its respo...

  5. HighCVSS 8.1 EPSS 0.34%

    ETIC Telecom RAS versions 4.7.0 and prior the web management portal authentication disabled by default. This could allow an attacker with adjacent network access to alter the configuration of the device or cause a denial-of-service condition.

  6. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 1.1%

    All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) 4.5.0 and prior’s application programmable interface (API) is vulnerable to directory traversal through several different methods. This could allow an attacker to read sensitive files from the server, including SSH private k...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.