In gittuf 0.10.0 through 0.15.0, when a minimum threshold global rule and a policy rule protect the same namespace, verification gives the global rule's check over all trusted users in the policy precedence over the policy rule's own authorized users. A user listed in the policy...
Vendor
gittuf vulnerabilities
5 published CVES affecting gittuf, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 5
- Critical
- 0
- High
- 0
- Medium
- 4
- Low
- 1
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 0
Products
Latest gittuf CVEs
Newest publication first
-
MediumCVSS 6.5
-
LowCVSS 2.3
In gittuf 0.4.0 through 0.16.0, when a policy update appears within the range of reference state log entries being verified, verification checks only the root of trust signatures of the new policy and not the signatures of its other metadata (rule files). A user trusted to push t...
-
MediumCVSS 5.5
In gittuf 0.10.0 through 0.17.0, the verification workflow does not load policy updates that are propagated from an upstream (controller) repository and recorded in the reference state log after the first entry being verified. Only the propagated policy in effect at the start of...
-
CVE-2026-128034 gittuf: File protection rules bypassed for filenames with special characters
PublishedMediumCVSS 5.5In gittuf before 0.18.0, verification of file protection rules uses the quoted, escaped pathnames that Git prints by default for files with special characters (for example non-ASCII characters) instead of the raw paths. Such paths do not match patterns like file:internal/*, so th...
-
MediumCVSS 4.9 EPSS 0.20%
gittuf is a platform-agnostic Git security system. Prior to 0.14.0, an attacker with push access to gittuf's Reference State Log (RSL) can roll back the current policy to any previous policy trusted by the current set of root keys. gittuf determines the policy to load by inspecti...
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.