Skip to content

Product

GNU gcc vulnerabilities

12 published CVES affecting GNU gcc, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
12
Critical
0
High
6
Medium
5
Low
1
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0

Latest GNU gcc CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 3.2%

    The POWER9 backend in GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) before version 10 could optimize multiple calls of the __builtin_darn intrinsic into a single call, thus reducing the entropy of the random number generator. This occurred because a volatile operation was not specified. For exam...

  2. HighCVSS 8.1 EPSS 2.7%

    stack_protect_prologue in cfgexpand.c and stack_protect_epilogue in function.c in GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) 4.1 through 8 (under certain circumstances) generate instruction sequences when targeting ARM targets that spill the address of the stack protector guard, which allows...

  3. MediumCVSS 4.0 EPSS 0.47%

    Under certain circumstances, the ix86_expand_builtin function in i386.c in GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) version 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5 before 5.5, and 6 before 6.4 will generate instruction sequences that clobber the status flag of the RDRAND and RDSEED intrinsics before it can b...

  4. MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 2.9%

    The std::random_device class in libstdc++ in the GNU Compiler Collection (aka GCC) before 4.9.4 does not properly handle short reads from blocking sources, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to predict the random values via unspecified vectors.

  5. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 2.8%

    gcc 4.3.x does not generate a cld instruction while compiling functions used for string manipulation such as memcpy and memmove on x86 and i386, which can prevent the direction flag (DF) from being reset in violation of ABI conventions and cause data to be copied in the wrong dir...

  6. LowCVSS 2.1 EPSS 0.43%

    fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into app...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.