An issue was discovered in Mailman Core before 3.3.5. An attacker with access to the REST API could use timing attacks to determine the value of the configured REST API password and then make arbitrary REST API calls. The REST API is bound to localhost by default, limiting the ab...
Product
GNU mailman vulnerabilities
43 published CVES affecting GNU mailman, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 43
- Critical
- 0
- High
- 11
- Medium
- 28
- Low
- 4
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 0
Latest GNU mailman CVEs
Newest publication first · page 1 of 2
-
MediumCVSS 6.3 EPSS 0.30%
-
HighCVSS 8.8 EPSS 0.76%
In GNU Mailman before 2.1.38, a list member or moderator can get a CSRF token and craft an admin request (using that token) to set a new admin password or make other changes.
-
MediumCVSS 6.5 EPSS 1.2%
In GNU Mailman before 2.1.36, the CSRF token for the Cgi/admindb.py admindb page contains an encrypted version of the list admin password. This could potentially be cracked by a moderator via an offline brute-force attack.
-
MediumCVSS 6.1 EPSS 1.4%
In GNU Mailman before 2.1.36, a crafted URL to the Cgi/options.py user options page can execute arbitrary JavaScript for XSS.
-
HighCVSS 8.0 EPSS 1.3%
GNU Mailman before 2.1.35 may allow remote Privilege Escalation. A csrf_token value is not specific to a single user account. An attacker can obtain a value within the context of an unprivileged user account, and then use that value in a CSRF attack against an admin (e.g., for ac...
-
MediumCVSS 4.3 EPSS 1.3%
GNU Mailman before 2.1.35 may allow remote Privilege Escalation. A certain csrf_token value is derived from the admin password, and may be useful in conducting a brute-force attack against that password.
-
MediumCVSS 4.3 EPSS 1.9%
GNU Mailman before 2.1.33 allows arbitrary content injection via the Cgi/private.py private archive login page.
-
CVE-2020-12108 /options/mailman in GNU Mailman before 2.1.31 allows Arbitrary Content Injection.
PublishedMediumCVSS 6.5 EPSS 2.7%/options/mailman in GNU Mailman before 2.1.31 allows Arbitrary Content Injection.
-
MediumCVSS 6.1 EPSS 2.3%
GNU Mailman 2.x before 2.1.30 uses the .obj extension for scrubbed application/octet-stream MIME parts. This behavior may contribute to XSS attacks against list-archive visitors, because an HTTP reply from an archive web server may lack a MIME type, and a web browser may perform...
-
MediumCVSS 5.4 EPSS 2.0%
Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Mailman 2.1.26 and earlier allows remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
-
MediumCVSS 6.5 EPSS 2.5%
An issue was discovered in GNU Mailman before 2.1.28. A crafted URL can cause arbitrary text to be displayed on a web page from a trusted site.
-
MediumCVSS 6.1 EPSS 4.6%
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web UI in Mailman before 2.1.26 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a user-options URL.
-
HighCVSS 8.8 EPSS 1.5%
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin web interface in GNU Mailman before 2.1.15 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.
-
HighCVSS 8.8 EPSS 1.6%
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the user options page in GNU Mailman 2.1.x before 2.1.23 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify an option, as demonstrated by gaining access to the credentials of a victim...
-
HighCVSS 7.6 EPSS 7.9%
Directory traversal vulnerability in GNU Mailman before 2.1.20, when not using a static alias, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in a list name.
-
MediumCVSS 4.3 EPSS 0.98%
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in mmsearch/design in the Mailman/htdig integration patch for Mailman allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the config parameter.
-
MediumCVSS 4.3 EPSS 4.2%
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cgi/confirm.py in GNU Mailman 2.1.14 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) full name or (2) username field in a confirmation message.
-
LowCVSS 3.5 EPSS 2.0%
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in GNU Mailman before 2.1.14rc1 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving (1) the list information field or (2) the list description field.
-
LowCVSS 2.6 EPSS 3.0%
CRLF injection vulnerability in Utils.py in Mailman before 2.1.9rc1 allows remote attackers to spoof messages in the error log and possibly trick the administrator into visiting malicious URLs via CRLF sequences in the URI.
-
MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 2.7%
Mailman before 2.1.9rc1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors involving "standards-breaking RFC 2231 formatted headers".
-
MediumCVSS 6.8 EPSS 6.9%
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Mailman before 2.1.9rc1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
-
LowCVSS 2.6 EPSS 1.4%
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the private archive script (private.py) in GNU Mailman 2.1.7 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the action argument.
-
MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 2.7%
The attachment scrubber (Scrubber.py) in Mailman 2.1.5 and earlier, when using Python's library email module 2.5, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (mailing list delivery failure) via a multipart MIME message with a single part that has two blank lines between...
-
HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 3.1%
Mailman 2.1.4 through 2.1.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a message that causes the server to "fail with an Overflow on bad date data in a processed message," a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-3573.
-
MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 2.7%
Scrubber.py in Mailman 2.1.5-8 does not properly handle UTF8 character encodings in filenames of e-mail attachments, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash).
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.