HTTP File Server (HFS) before 2.2c allows remote attackers to obtain configuration and usage details by using an id element such as <id>%version%</id> in HTTP Basic Authentication instead of a username and password, as demonstrated by placing this id element in the userinfo subco...
Product
hfs http file server vulnerabilities
6 published CVES affecting hfs http file server, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 6
- Critical
- 0
- High
- 1
- Medium
- 5
- Low
- 0
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 0
Latest hfs http file server CVEs
Newest publication first
-
MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 1.8%
-
MediumCVSS 4.3 EPSS 1.3%
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in HTTP File Server (HFS) before 2.2c allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the userinfo subcomponent of a URL.
-
MediumCVSS 6.4 EPSS 1.7%
HTTP File Server (HFS) before 2.2c allows remote attackers to append arbitrary text to the log file by using the base64 representation of this text during HTTP Basic Authentication.
-
MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 1.6%
HTTP File Server (HFS) before 2.2c tags HTTP request log entries with the username sent during HTTP Basic Authentication, regardless of whether authentication succeeded, which might make it more difficult for an administrator to determine who made a remote request.
-
HighCVSS 10.0 EPSS 3.1%
Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in HTTP File Server (HFS) before 2.2c, when account names are used as log filenames, allow remote attackers to create arbitrary (1) files and (2) directories via a .. (dot dot) in an account name, when requesting the / URI; and (3) app...
-
MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 3.6% Public exploit
HTTP File Server (HFS) before 2.2c, when account names are used as log filenames, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a long account name.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.