Skip to content

Vendor

ingres vulnerabilities

7 published CVES affecting ingres, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
7
Critical
0
High
3
Medium
3
Low
1
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0
Atom feed of ingres alerts

Products

Latest ingres CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. MediumCVSS 4.6 EPSS 0.44%

    Stack-based buffer overflow in the libbecompat library in Ingres 2.6, Ingres 2006 release 1 (aka 9.0.4), and Ingres 2006 release 2 (aka 9.1.0) on Linux and HP-UX allows local users to gain privileges by setting a long value of an environment variable before running (1) verifydb,...

  2. MediumCVSS 4.6 EPSS 0.37%

    verifydb in Ingres 2.6, Ingres 2006 release 1 (aka 9.0.4), and Ingres 2006 release 2 (aka 9.1.0) on Linux and other Unix platforms sets the ownership or permissions of an iivdb.log file without verifying that it is the application's own log file, which allows local users to overw...

  3. HighCVSS 10.0 EPSS 6.7%

    Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Ingres database server 2006 9.0.4, r3, 2.6, and 2.5, as used in multiple CA (Computer Associates) products, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the (1) uuid_from_char or (2) duve_get_args functions.

  4. HighCVSS 10.0 EPSS 9.0% PoC

    Multiple "pointer overwrite" vulnerabilities in Ingres database server 2006 9.0.4, r3, 2.6, and 2.5, as used in multiple CA (formerly Computer Associates) products, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending certain TCP data at different times to the Ingres Commu...

  5. HighCVSS 10.0 EPSS 10.3% PoC

    Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in the (1) Communications Server (iigcc.exe) and (2) Data Access Server (iigcd.exe) components for Ingres Database Server 3.0.3, as used in CA (Computer Associates) products including eTrust Secure Content Manager r8 on Windows, allow remote a...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.