Product
9 published CVES affecting interspire email marketer, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
Newest publication first
Interspire Email Marketer through 6.5.1 allows SQL Injection via the surveys module. An unauthenticated attacker could successfully perform an attack to extract potentially sensitive information from the database if the survey id exists.
Interspire Email Marketer through 6.5.0 allows arbitrary file upload via a surveys_submit.php "create survey and submit survey" operation, which can cause a .php file to be accessible under a /admin/temp/surveys/ URI. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2...
admin/functions/remote.php in Interspire Email Marketer through 6.1.6 has Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via a what=importurl&url= request with an http or https URL. This also allows reading local files with a file: URL.
Interspire Email Marketer through 6.1.6 has SQL Injection via an updateblock sortorder request to Dynamiccontenttags.php
Interspire Email Marketer through 6.1.6 has SQL Injection via a deleteblock blockid[] request to Dynamiccontenttags.php.
Interspire Email Marketer through 6.1.6 has SQL Injection via a checkduplicatetags tagname request to Dynamiccontenttags.php.
Interspire Email Marketer through 6.1.6 has SQL Injection via a tagids Delete action to Dynamiccontenttags.php.
Interspire Email Marketer through 6.1.6 allows arbitrary file upload via a surveys_submit.php "create survey and submit survey" operation, which can cause a .php file to be accessible under a admin/temp/surveys/ URI.
The function in charge to check whether the user is already logged in init.php in Interspire Email Marketer (IEM) prior to 6.1.6 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and obtain administrative access by using the IEM_CookieLogin cookie with a specially crafted value.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.