Product
17 published CVES affecting libming ming, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
Newest publication first
Ming 0.4.8 has an out-of-bounds buffer overwrite issue in the function getName() in decompiler.c file that causes a direct segmentation fault and leads to denial of service.
Ming 0.4.8 has an out-of-bounds buffer access issue in the function getString() in decompiler.c file that causes a direct segmentation fault and leads to denial of service.
Ming 0.4.8 has an out-of-bounds buffer access issue in the function decompileINCR_DECR() in decompiler.c file that causes a direct segmentation fault and leads to denial of service.
Ming 0.4.8 has an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the function decompileIF() in the decompile.c file that causes a direct segmentation fault and leads to denial of service.
Ming 0.4.8 has an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the function newVar_N() in decompile.c which causes a huge information leak.
Ming (aka libming) 0.4.8 has an out of bounds write vulnerability in the function strcpyext() in the decompile.c file in libutil.a.
Ming (aka libming) 0.4.8 has a NULL pointer dereference in the function getString() in the decompile.c file in libutil.a.
A heap-based buffer over-read was found in the function decompileCALLFUNCTION in util/decompile.c in Ming 0.4.8, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file.
A null pointer dereference vulnerability was found in the function stackswap (called from decompileSTACKSWAP) in util/decompile.c in Ming 0.4.8, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file.
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the function dcputs (called from decompileIMPLEMENTS) in util/decompile.c in Ming 0.4.8, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file.
An invalid memory read vulnerability was found in the function OpCode (called from isLogicalOp and decompileIF) in util/decompile.c in Ming 0.4.8, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file.
A heap-based buffer over-read was found in the function OpCode (called from decompileINCR_DECR line 1474) in util/decompile.c in Ming 0.4.8, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file.
A heap-based buffer over-read was found in the function OpCode (called from decompileINCR_DECR line 1440) in util/decompile.c in Ming 0.4.8, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file.
A heap-based buffer over-read was found in the function OpCode (called from decompileSETMEMBER) in util/decompile.c in Ming 0.4.8, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file.
A memory leak was found in the function parseSWF_SHAPEWITHSTYLE in util/parser.c in Ming 0.4.8, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file.
A heap-based buffer over-read was found in the function decompileIF in util/decompile.c in Ming 0.4.8, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file.
A memory leak vulnerability was found in the function parseSWF_DOACTION in util/parser.c in Ming 0.4.8, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.