Format string vulnerabilities in Livingston/Lucent RADIUS before 2.1.va.1 may allow local or remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via format specifiers that are injected into log messages.
Product
lucent radius vulnerabilities
5 published CVES affecting lucent radius, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 5
- Critical
- 0
- High
- 3
- Medium
- 2
- Low
- 0
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 0
Latest lucent radius CVEs
Newest publication first
-
HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 2.8%
-
MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 5.4%
Multiple RADIUS implementations do not properly validate the Vendor-Length of the Vendor-Specific attribute, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a Vendor-Length that is less than 2.
-
HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 8.5%
Buffer overflow in digest calculation function of multiple RADIUS implementations allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via shared secret data.
-
MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 1.4%
Directory traversal vulnerability in Livingston/Lucent RADIUS before 2.1.va.1 may allow attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) attack.
-
HighCVSS 10.0 EPSS 6.7%
Multiple buffer overflows in RADIUS daemon radiusd in (1) Merit 3.6b and (2) Lucent 2.1-2 RADIUS allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary commands.
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.