Skip to content

Product

matrix olm vulnerabilities

5 published CVES affecting matrix olm, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
5
Critical
2
High
0
Medium
3
Low
0
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0

Latest matrix olm CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. MediumCVSS 4.3 EPSS 0.30%

    An issue was discovered in Matrix libolm through 3.2.16. There is Ed25519 signature malleability due to lack of validation criteria (does not ensure that S < n). This refers to the libolm implementation of Olm. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer sup...

  2. MediumCVSS 5.3 EPSS 0.54%

    An issue was discovered in Matrix libolm through 3.2.16. Cache-timing attacks can occur due to use of base64 when decoding group session keys. This refers to the libolm implementation of Olm. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maint...

  3. MediumCVSS 5.3 EPSS 0.45%

    An issue was discovered in Matrix libolm through 3.2.16. The AES implementation is vulnerable to cache-timing attacks due to use of S-boxes. This is related to software that uses a lookup table for the SubWord step. This refers to the libolm implementation of Olm. NOTE: This vuln...

  4. CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 2.0%

    The olm_session_describe function in Matrix libolm before 3.2.7 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow. The Olm session object represents a cryptographic channel between two parties. Therefore, its state is partially controllable by the remote party of the channel. Attackers can cons...

  5. CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 4.3%

    Matrix libolm before 3.2.3 allows a malicious Matrix homeserver to crash a client (while it is attempting to retrieve an Olm encrypted room key backup from the homeserver) because olm_pk_decrypt has a stack-based buffer overflow. Remote code execution might be possible for some n...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.