Skip to content

Product

redhat/libxml2 vulnerabilities

18 published CVES affecting redhat/libxml2, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
18
Critical
0
High
11
Medium
4
Low
3
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0

Latest redhat/libxml2 CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. HighCVSS 8.5 EPSS 0.66%

    A flaw was found in libxml2 with Python bindings enabled. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing a specially crafted XML document containing a Document Type Definition (DTD) with enumerated attribute values. This triggers a double-free error in the SAX at...

  2. HighCVSS 7.8 EPSS 0.19%

    In xinclude in libxml2 before 2.15.4, xmlXIncludeProcess and xmlXIncludeProcessTree do not propagate parseFlags. This has security relevance for, for example, the XML_PARSE_NONET flag, if (without it) a custom resource loader accesses the internet and triggers XML external entity...

  3. HighCVSS 7.3 EPSS 0.19%

    In xmlIO in libxml2 before 2.15.4, an inconsistency in xmlOutputWriteCallback and xmlBufUse causes negative lengths to reach write callbacks, aka a lack of a check for integer overflow before calling writecallback. This has security relevance for many types of uses of that length...

  4. LowCVSS 2.9 EPSS 0.46%

    A flaw was found in the libxml2 library. This uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability occurs when processing XML catalogs that contain repeated <nextCatalog> elements pointing to the same downstream catalog. A remote attacker can exploit this by supplying crafted catalogs...

  5. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 4.0%

    It was found that Red Hat JBoss Core Services erratum RHSA-2016:2957 for CVE-2016-3705 did not actually include the fix for the issue found in libxml2, making it vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack due to a Stack Overflow. This is a regression CVE for the same issue as CVE-2...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.