A buffer overflow vulnerability in the Brotli decoder (c/dec/decode.c) in Google Brotli versions 1.0.3 through 1.2.0 on all platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to corrupt adjacent decoder state memory, disclose sensitive memory contents, cause a denial of service,...
Product
redhat/python-brotli vulnerabilities
11 published CVES affecting redhat/python-brotli, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 11
- Critical
- 2
- High
- 8
- Medium
- 1
- Low
- 0
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 1
Latest redhat/python-brotli CVEs
Newest publication first
-
CriticalCVSS 9.2 EPSS 82.6% CISA KEV added 2026-10-27 Exploited in the wild
-
CVE-2026-1961 Forman: foreman: remote code execution via command injection in websocket proxy
PublishedHighCVSS 8.0A flaw was found in Foreman. A remote attacker could exploit a command injection vulnerability in Foreman's WebSocket proxy implementation. This vulnerability arises from the system's use of unsanitized hostname values from compute resource providers when constructing shell comma...
-
MediumCVSS 5.4
A flaw was found in the Katello plugin for Red Hat Satellite. This vulnerability, caused by improper sanitization of user-provided input, allows a remote attacker to inject arbitrary SQL commands into the sort_by parameter of the /api/hosts/bootc_images API endpoint. This can lea...
-
CriticalCVSS 10.0
During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and...
-
CVE-2025-14550 Potential denial-of-service vulnerability via repeated headers when using ASGI
PublishedHighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 1.1%An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. ASGIRequest allows a remote attacker to cause a potential denial-of-service via a crafted request with multiple duplicate headers. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and...
-
HighCVSS 8.5 EPSS 0.90%
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. .QuerySet.order_by() is subject to SQL injection in column aliases containing periods when the same alias is, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, used in FilteredRel...
-
HighCVSS 8.3
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. FilteredRelation is subject to SQL injection in column aliases via control characters, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to QuerySet methods...
-
CVE-2026-1285 Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.text.Truncator HTML methods
PublishedHighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 1.1%An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. django.utils.text.Truncator.chars() and Truncator.words() methods (with html=True) and the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters allow a remote attacker to cause a potentia...
-
HighCVSS 8.3
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. Raster lookups on RasterField (only implemented on PostGIS) allows remote attackers to inject SQL via the band index parameter. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2...
-
HighCVSS 8.1 PoC
A flaw was found in fog-kubevirt. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack due to disabled certificate validation. This enables the attacker to intercept and potentially alter sensitive communications between Satellite and OpenShift...
-
HighCVSS 8.1 PoC
A flaw was found in foreman_kubevirt. When configuring the connection to OpenShift, the system disables SSL verification if a Certificate Authority (CA) certificate is not explicitly set. This insecure default allows a remote attacker, capable of intercepting network traffic betw...
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.