Skip to content

Product

redhat/python-lxml vulnerabilities

9 published CVES affecting redhat/python-lxml, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
9
Critical
1
High
8
Medium
0
Low
0
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0

Latest redhat/python-lxml CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. CriticalCVSS 9.1

    A flaw was found in Foreman. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user with low-level Viewer permissions to cause unauthorized information disclosure by submitting requests to template preview endpoints. By exploiting this issue, the user can access sensitive data, such as...

  2. HighCVSS 8.2 EPSS 0.30%

    lxml is a library for processing XML and HTML in the Python language. Prior to 6.1.1, link attributes in lxml.html.defs.link_attrs were missing xlink:href, which can be used for URL bypass attacks in embedded SVG/MathML/etc. content. This vulnerability was fixed in lxml 6.1.1 and...

  3. HighCVSS 7.2

    GitPython versions before 3.1.54 contain an arbitrary file overwrite vulnerability in the Diffable.diff method that fails to validate git options passed through kwargs. Attackers can supply the --output argument via the other parameter or output kwarg to write patch content to at...

  4. HighCVSS 7.7

    GitPython before 3.1.54 contains an incomplete denylist in unsafe_git_clone_options that omits --template, allowing attackers to achieve arbitrary command execution during clone operations. Attackers can supply --template pointing to a directory containing malicious post-checkout...

  5. HighCVSS 7.2 EPSS 0.57%

    GitPython before 3.1.57 fails to guard git option forwarding in IndexFile.checkout() and TagReference.create(), allowing attackers to pass unsafe options via kwargs. Attackers can use --prefix to overwrite arbitrary files with repository content or -F to read arbitrary files retu...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.