pip would incorrectly handle doubly-encoded package URLs from indexes allowing for files to be installed to arbitrary locations on disk even when installing wheels. This vulnerability requires downloading or installing a package from a malicious package index to succeed, maliciou...
Product
redhat/python-pip-main vulnerabilities
5 published CVES affecting redhat/python-pip-main, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 5
- Critical
- 0
- High
- 0
- Medium
- 4
- Low
- 1
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 0
Latest redhat/python-pip-main CVEs
Newest publication first
-
MediumCVSS 5.6
-
CVE-2026-8643 pip can extract console_scripts and gui_scripts outside installation directory
PublishedMediumCVSS 4.1pip would treat console_scripts and gui_scripts as paths instead of file names without sanitizing the resolved absolute path to the installation directory, leading to entry points being installed outside the installation directory.
-
MediumCVSS 5.3
pip prior to version 26.1 would run self-update check functionality after installing wheel files which required importing well-known Python modules names. These module imports were intentionally deferred to increase startup time of the pip CLI. The patch changes self-update funct...
-
MediumCVSS 4.6 EPSS 0.14%
pip handles concatenated tar and ZIP files as ZIP files regardless of filename or whether a file is both a tar and ZIP file. This behavior could result in confusing installation behavior, such as installing "incorrect" files according to the filename of the archive. New behavior...
-
LowCVSS 2.0
When pip is installing and extracting a maliciously crafted wheel archive, files may be extracted outside the installation directory. The path traversal is limited to prefixes of the installation directory, thus isn't able to inject or overwrite executable files in typical situat...
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.