Vendor
17 published CVES affecting reprisesoftware, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
Newest publication first
Reprise License Manager 14.2 is vulnerable to reflected cross-site scripting in /goform/activate_process via the akey parameter.
Incorrect access control in Reprise License Management Software Reprise License Manager v15.1 allows read-only users to arbitrarily change the password of an admin and hijack their account.
Incorrect access control in Reprise License Management Software Reprise License Manager v15.1 allows attackers to arbitrarily save sensitive files in insecure locations via a crafted POST request.
Directory traversal vulnerability in Reprise License Manager (RLM) web interface before 14.2BL4 in the diagnostics function that allows RLM users with sufficient privileges to overwrite any file the on the server.
CRLF vulnerability in Reprise License Manager (RLM) web interface through 14.2BL4 in the password parameter in View License Result function, that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers.
An SSRF issue was discovered in Reprise License Manager (RLM) web interface through 14.2BL4 that allows remote attackers to trigger outbound requests to intranet servers, conduct port scans via the actserver parameter in License Activation function.
XSS in signing form in Reprise Software RLM License Administration v14.2BL4 allows remote attacker to inject arbitrary code via password field.
Reprise License Manager 14.2 is affected by a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) in the /goform/rlmswitchr_process file parameter via GET. Authentication is required.
Reprise License Manager 14.2 is affected by a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) in the /goform/login_process username parameter via GET. No authentication is required.
Reprise License Manager 14.2 is affected by an Information Disclosure vulnerability via a GET request to /goforms/rlminfo. No authentication is required. The information disclosed is associated with software versions, process IDs, network configuration, hostname(s), system archit...
Reprise License Manager 14.2 is affected by a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the /goform/activate_process "count" parameter via GET. No authentication is required.
An issue was discovered in Reprise RLM 14.2. By using an admin account, an attacker can write a payload to /goform/edit_opt, which will then be triggered when running the diagnostics (via /goform/diagnostics_doit), resulting in a buffer overflow.
An issue was discovered in Reprise RLM 14.2. When editing the license file, it is possible for an admin user to enable an option to run arbitrary executables, as demonstrated by an ISV demo "C:\Windows\System32\calc.exe" entry. An attacker can exploit this to run a malicious bina...
An issue was discovered in /goform/login_process in Reprise RLM 14.2. When an attacker attempts to login, the response if a username is valid includes Login Failed, but does not include this string if the username is invalid. This allows an attacker to enumerate valid users.
An issue was discovered in Reprise RLM 14.2. Because /goform/change_password_process does not verify authentication or authorization, an unauthenticated user can change the password of any existing user. This allows an attacker to change the password of any known user, thereby pr...
An issue was discovered in Reprise RLM 14.2. As the session cookies are small, an attacker can hijack any existing sessions by bruteforcing the 4 hex-character session cookie on the Windows version (the Linux version appears to have 8 characters). An attacker can obtain the stati...
An issue was discovered in Reprise License Manager 11.0. This vulnerability is a Path Traversal where the attacker, by changing a field in the Web Request, can have access to files on the File System of the Server. By specifying a pathname in the POST parameter "lf" to the goform...
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.