In SweetScape 010 Editor 9.0.1, an integer overflow during the initialization of variables could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service.
Vendor
sweetscape vulnerabilities
6 published CVES affecting sweetscape, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).
- Total
- 6
- Critical
- 1
- High
- 2
- Medium
- 3
- Low
- 0
- Unscored
- 0
- CISA KEV
- 0
Products
Latest sweetscape CVEs
Newest publication first
-
MediumCVSS 5.5 EPSS 1.5%
-
MediumCVSS 5.5 EPSS 2.1%
In SweetScape 010 Editor 9.0.1, improper validation of arguments in the internal implementation of the Memcpy function (provided by the scripting engine) allows an attacker to overwrite arbitrary memory, which could lead to code execution.
-
HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 1.2%
In SweetScape 010 Editor 9.0.1, improper validation of arguments in the internal implementation of the WSubStr function (provided by the scripting engine) allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by crashing the application.
-
CriticalCVSS 9.8 EPSS 2.4%
In SweetScape 010 Editor 9.0.1, improper validation of arguments in the internal implementation of the StrCat function (provided by the scripting engine) allows an attacker to overwrite arbitrary memory, which could lead to code execution.
-
HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 1.2%
In SweetScape 010 Editor 9.0.1, improper validation of arguments in the internal implementation of the SubStr function (provided by the scripting engine) allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by crashing the application.
-
MediumCVSS 6.9 EPSS 0.40%
Untrusted search path vulnerability in 010 Editor before 3.1.3 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse wintab32.dll file in the current working directory, as demonstrated by a directory that contains a .hex file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from thir...
Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.