Skip to content

Product

sysax multi server vulnerabilities

12 published CVES affecting sysax multi server, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
12
Critical
1
High
5
Medium
6
Low
0
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0

Latest sysax multi server CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. MediumCVSS 5.1

    Sysax Multi Server 6.95 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the administrative password field that allows attackers to crash the application. Attackers can overwrite the password field with 800 bytes of repeated characters to trigger an application crash and disrupt ser...

  2. CriticalCVSS 9.3 EPSS 4.7% Framework module

    Sysax Multi Server versions prior to 5.55 contain a stack-based buffer overflow in its SSH service. When a remote attacker supplies an overly long username during authentication, the server copies the input to a fixed-size stack buffer without proper bounds checking. This allows...

  3. HighCVSS 8.7 EPSS 1.9% Framework module

    A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in Sysax Multi-Server version 6.10 via its SSH daemon. A specially crafted SSH key exchange packet can trigger a crash in the service, resulting in loss of availability. The flaw is triggered during the handling of malformed key exchange d...

  4. MediumCVSS 6.5

    When uploading a file in Sysax Multi Server 6.90, an authenticated user can modify the filename="" parameter in the uploadfile_name1.htm form to a length of 368 or more bytes. This will create a buffer overflow condition, causing the application to crash.

  5. HighCVSS 9.0 Public exploit

    Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Sysax Multi Server 4.5 allow remote authenticated users to read or modify arbitrary files via crafted FTP commands. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.