Skip to content

Vendor

teclib-edition vulnerabilities

13 published CVES affecting teclib-edition, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
13
Critical
5
High
2
Medium
5
Low
1
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0
Atom feed of teclib-edition alerts

Products

Latest teclib-edition CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. MediumCVSS 6.5 EPSS 0.33%

    GLPI is a free Asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 11.0.0 and prior to version 11.0.6, a malicious actor with knowledge of a user's credentials can bypass MFA and steal their account. Version 11.0.6 fixes the issue.

  2. HighCVSS 8.8 EPSS 0.37%

    GLPI is an open-source asset and IT management software package that provides ITIL Service Desk features, licenses tracking and software auditing. From 11.0.0 to before 11.0.5, an authenticated technician user can upload a malicious file and trigger its execution through an unsaf...

  3. MediumCVSS 5.4 EPSS 0.55%

    Formcreator is a GLPI plugin which allow creation of custom forms and the creation of one or more tickets when the form is filled. A probable stored cross-site scripting vulnerability is present in Formcreator 2.13.5 and prior via the use of the use of ##FULLFORM## for rendering....

  4. CriticalCVSS 9.9 EPSS 9.1%

    GLPI is an open source IT Asset Management, issue tracking system and service desk system. The GLPI addressing plugin in versions < 2.9.1 suffers from authenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability, allowing access to the server's underlying operating system using command inje...

  5. LowCVSS 3.3 EPSS 1.7% Public exploit

    An issue was discovered in armadito-windows-driver/src/communication.c in Armadito 0.12.7.2. Malware with filenames containing pure UTF-16 characters can bypass detection. The user-mode service will fail to open the file for scanning after the conversion is done from Unicode to A...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.