Skip to content

Vendor

usermin vulnerabilities

14 published CVES affecting usermin, from public sources (CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV).

Total
14
Critical
0
High
7
Medium
5
Low
2
Unscored
0
CISA KEV
0
Atom feed of usermin alerts

Products

Latest usermin CVEs

Newest publication first

  1. LowCVSS 3.6 EPSS 0.88%

    Usermin before 1.220 (20060629) allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, possibly related to chfn/save.cgi not properly handling an empty shell parameter, which results in changing root's shell instead of the shell of a specified user.

  2. MediumCVSS 6.8 EPSS 3.2%

    Webmin before 1.296 and Usermin before 1.226 do not properly handle a URL with a null ("%00") character, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS), read CGI program source code, list directories, and possibly execute programs.

  3. MediumCVSS 5.0 EPSS 79.5% Framework module Public exploit

    Webmin before 1.290 and Usermin before 1.220 calls the simplify_path function before decoding HTML, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, as demonstrated using "..%01" sequences, which bypass the removal of "../" sequences before bytes such as "%01" are removed f...

  4. HighCVSS 10.0 EPSS 15.5%

    miniserv.pl in (1) Webmin before 1.070 and (2) Usermin before 1.000 does not properly handle metacharacters such as line feeds and carriage returns (CRLF) in Base-64 encoded strings during Basic authentication, which allows remote attackers to spoof a session ID and gain root pri...

  5. HighCVSS 7.5 EPSS 1.9%

    (1) Webmin 0.96 and (2) Usermin 0.90 with password timeouts enabled allow local and possibly remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain privileges via certain control characters in the authentication information, which can force Webmin or Usermin to accept arbitrary usern...

Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, OSV and public exploit-reference metadata. Product matching comes from the published CVE records. A proof-of-concept means public code exists; it is not evidence of exploitation.